Google
 

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Home Price Forecast

The Case-Shiller home price index fell again for the month of May. Home prices nationwide are down about 16% in the past 12 months. For most Americans, their home is their biggest investment. For them, a 16% decline in 12 months is brutal. An estimated 3 million homes will be foreclosed in 2008. That is flooding a real estate resale market that is now running at about 4.5 million homes per year. As a result, almost 2 out of 3 homes sold in the next 12 months will be foreclosures.

When foreclosures are a small fraction of the total real estate market, they don't affect the average home price. In a normal market Realtors won't even show a prospective homebuyer foreclosed homes. They either want to a) fix them up and flip them themselves for a quick profit or b) show the buyer something more expensive in order to earn a bigger commission. But the number of foreclosed homes has long passed the critical mass necessary to impact the average home price. One indication of this is the Realtors that are organizing bus tours of foreclosed homes.

At this time, every new foreclosure on the market lowers the average sales price. Every time a bank initiates a foreclosure, they are lowering the market price on the homes they are already trying to sell. It would make sense for the banks to tell borrowers that have missed a couple of payments, "Just pay us something. If you make at least half of your required payment we'll forestall initiating the foreclosure proceedings." Then they could focus on the serious deadbeats while they try to trim their inventory of homes that they already own. The result would be a higher average home price and reduced losses.

Unfortunately, the system is set up so that the company servicing the mortgage is not the same as the one that gets the partial payout when the home is foreclosed. The servicer is losing money with each missed payment, so the servicer has an incentive to foreclose as quickly as possible. But the servicer is not responsible for the value of the property when it is sold. To the servicer, what matters is cash flow, not loss mitigation. So as property values drop, homeowners have less incentive to make their monthly payments and foreclosure filings accelerate. The whole thing creates a negative feedback loop that floods the market with empty homes and reduces the value for all homeowners.

The drop in home prices has been long enough and hard enough that pessimism in the real estate and homebuilding industry is at an all time high. The prevailing wisdom is that this will continue for a long time to come. Yet the latest home price data offers a reason for hope. While home prices continue to drop, the veocity of the drop seemed to hit its peak in the first quarter of 2008. The rate at which home prices are decreasing slowed in April and May.

Some of this can be explained by seasonal patterns. Home prices tend to rise faster in April through August than during the rest of the year. But that seasonality explains only a small part of the flattening prices. It's dangerous to make long term projections based on just a few months of data flattening the curve, but it's now beginning to appear that home prices in general will continue to drop for the next 12 months or so, but are starting to stabilize.

Since California and Florida are two states of high interest, I've prepared two graphs that show the direction of home prices indicated by the current data. The graphs show forecast results up through August 2009.




























If you are interested in other cities, please reply to this post and let me know where your real estate interest is.

The data right now is pointing to a return to prices that represent a 4% to 5% annual return since 2000. Four percent is a sustainable level of return. The curves shown are simply a reversion to the mean. The data right now is not pointing to an overcorrection which would give us a 10-year annual return significantly less than 4%. If the economy were to go into a significant recession, an overcorrection would be not only possible, but likely.

Qout

Sunday, July 27, 2008

S & P Earnings Estimates Update

S&P operating earnings estimates as posted by S&P for ‘08 and ’09. 


Operating earnings estimates continued their downward slide, accelerating this past week as reports poured in.  The 2009 estimates, IMO are not to be believed.  They project a 193.1% earnings growth in financials.  Want to buy land in Florida?

 

Report Dt 2008 2009

08/07/2007 106.59                 <-------2008 high

01/14/2008 100.32

01/22/2008 99.21

01/29.2008 99.00

02/05/2008 99.86

02/12/2008 99.51

02/19/2008 98.99

02/26/2008 98.63

03/04/2008 96.55

03/11/2008 96.71

03/18/2008 96.42

03/25/2008 96.26

03/31/2008 96.74

04/10/2008 96.79 115.42

04/16/2008 93.62 113.30

04/22/2008 92.31 112.17

04/28/2008 91.69 111.81

05/06/2008 90.91 110.29

05/13/2008 89.43 110.44

05/20/2008 89.29 109.53

05/27/2008 89.07 108.98

06/03/2008 89.27 109.04

06/10/2008 89.38 110.19

06/16/2008 89.03 109.94

06/24/2008 88.04 108.98

06/30/2008 87.83 108.77

07/08/2008 87.83 108.24

07/15/2008 86.73 108.22

07/22/2008 83.84 108.60

.

At Brinkers 16 to 17 times operating earnings, applying it to the S&P 7/22 estimate places the value for 2008 now at 1341 to 1425, and 2009 at 1738 to 1846. (FYI, the 2006 actual earnings were 87.72 and 2007 actual earnings were 82.54)

.

Bob last projected 1600 near the end of ’08 or into ’09.  On 4/6/08, he stated on the show that he expected record highs near the end of ’08, which means 1565.15 on a closing basis, as Bob mentioned this number on his show.  On the 7/26/08 show he stated “Would the market get to new all-time-highs within your time-frame of 1 to 3 years? Yeah. For me, my opinion on that would be -- without question."

.

Brinker said on Saturday April 5, 2008: “My number for the S&P 500 for 2008 is way below, way below the Wall Street number for 2008.”  LOL, see Kirks comment

.

Bob Norton's Evergreen was last reported July 1, …an average recessionary profit pullback indicates that earnings could be as low as $77.50 next year. Low interest rates and 4% inflation suggest to us that the market will likely trade within a volatile range of 1225-1350 during the next twelve months.”

And also,

In our last Quarterly Market Outlook, we projected that the market (S&P 500) would likely trade within a range of 1250-1450 for the remainder of 2008. After climbing to 1425 in mid-May, stocks have since backed-off to the lower end of our trading range and are unlikely to once again push through the upper end as consensus profit expectations for 2008 and 2009 are too high, in our opinion, and are expected to plunge in the months and quarters ahead. Since the S&P 500 is approaching bear market territory (1250 represents a 20% drop from last October's high of 1550) it appears the market is already discounting the prospects for recession in early 2009. Huge sums of cash on the sidelines, low sentiment levels, and stimulus-fueled economic gains may help set the stage for a second half rebound to the 1350 area. Downside support is in the 1225 range.”

 

John Mauldin commented in  "Outside the Box" that :  "As if this wasn't bad enough, in the past we have shown that analysts tend to be around about 10% too optimistic in their year-ahead forecasts of the earnings level. However, in recession years this jumps to 30% too optimistic. "

 

See Normxxx’s interesting posting “The Real P/E Ratio” here


==> Highest Yield CDs with FDIC <==


Since 12/31/98 "Kirk's Newsletter Explore Portfolio" is UP 152% (a double plus another 52%!!) vs. the S&P500 UP a tiny 1.4% vs. NASDAQ down 3.8%!!! (All through 6/30/10)

In 2009, "Kirk's Newsletter Explore Portfolio" gained 33.5% vs. the DJIA up 18.8%

For 2010, as of 7/15/10, the explore portfolio is up 2.3% YTD
vs. DJIA
down 0.7% vs. S&P500 down 0.7%!
  • Subscribe NOW and get the Current Month for FREE!
    (Just ask and mention this ad for the free issue)

  • Your 1 year, 12 issue subscription will start with next month's issue.